The whole space of strategy allocation is shaped by two massively important risks - inflation risk and gambler's ruin. The first bites your wealth from below, when your allocation strategy overall is too focused on principal protection, where the return can be below the inflation rate, and the second bites your wealth from above, when your allocation strategy overall is focused on principal growth and your 'bet on green' at the roulette table of life stops you out and you go home early. Each fate is ugly, you either dying in dog food penury or dying young in a bloody accident. It ought to be the goal of an ideal strategy allocation approach to avoid both outcomes and instead enjoy healthy lunches - free and paid for - over as long a stretch of your life as you can.
This blog post is in general a post for everyone, but of course poor people first need to arrive somehow at a pool of investable capital (separate from their day to day living costs and the capital they have for investing in their business). I think it is a fair statement, at this early stage, to suggest that younger folks with capital can afford to be closer to gambler's ruin than older folks, since they can trade their labour, brain, body, time for paying their today costs, whereas post-retirement oldies have less flexibility and hence have a big income draw-down demand.
How close a young investor gets, of course, to gambler's ruin, is a cultural question as well as an economic one. Their appetite for risk ought to be higher, insofar as making the tilt for wealth growth over wealth protection is paid for by their greater expected lifespan. I've heard it said that private equity / startup investors like to hear from a founder that they failed once or twice in the past. Secondly, bankruptcy law is all about buying back in gamblers who have reached ruin with their firm. Our culture of long term GDP growth has some of this risk taking burnt in. There's a sense that the fable of Icarus is seen not only as a warning but also as admirable somehow. Back through human history, we have moved forwards in time by combining our prudence with our spirit of adventure.
And vigour, life, vitality, novelty, creativity, growth, these are all inter-connected concepts culturally. As opposed to self-sustainability, entropy, predictability, familiarity, maintenance. But the ideal strategy allocation algorithm must partake in all of those concepts. Unfortunately, all too often, both of these existentially definitive risks are under-emphasised on behalf of investors. But wealth generation is in the limit a lifetime activity (longer, for companies, or for aristocrats or for anyone who plans to leave an inheritance for their loved ones). It is a common fate for us collectively to understand the importance of long term planning only as we get to be old.
a third force eating your wealth is transaction costs, often ignored, but hugely influential in determining the shape of the industry, and perhaps also of some relevance when considering an ideal strategy allocation algorithm. I shall no doubt return to this in future postings
ReplyDelete